Georgia Healthcare Compliance.
Georgia has no comprehensive state-specific medical-information privacy statute beyond HIPAA. The state's breach statute primarily reaches data brokers and entities that maintain computerized data; most healthcare providers work to the HIPAA federal baseline. Practices in Georgia should still maintain breach-notification documentation that meets HIPAA's 60-day clock.
At a glance
60days
Georgia requires notice in the most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay. Practices typically align to HIPAA's 60-day individual-notice clock.
Georgia Attorney General
- Georgia Personal Identity Protection ActO.C.G.A. § 10-1-910 et seq.
Data broker breach-notification statute. Does not directly cover most providers, who default to HIPAA.
- HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules45 CFR Parts 160 & 164
The federal baseline that all U.S. covered entities and business associates meet. HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces.
How Georgia goes further than HIPAA.
The breach window in Georgia aligns with HIPAA’s 60-day individual-notice deadline. State-law overlays here are mostly about who else gets notified, what the personal- information definition covers, and whether any named statute (CMIA, BIPA, MHMDA, HB 300, 201 CMR 17.00, SHIELD) adds substantive duties. Notice flows through Georgia Attorney General in addition to HHS/OCR federally.
Related compliance guides
Turn this overlay into a defensible SRA.
Georgia's overlay layers on top of HIPAA's federal floor. The free SRA readiness check walks a small practice through discovery, threat model, controls, and gap analysis, then assembles the review-ready binder — policies, training logs, BAAs, and a breach playbook tuned to the 60-day clock and the Georgia Attorney General notification path.
D3rx is a healthcare-billing and compliance research aid maintained by D3rx Inc. Articles are drafted by an LLM (Anthropic Claude) against primary HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and state-regulator publications, and reviewed for restraint and source fidelity by the D3rx team.
Reviewer status: a named credentialed reviewer (CHC, CHPC, or healthcare attorney) is being engaged. Until that engagement is finalized, this page does not claim credentialed review.
Related across the archive
- ComplianceGeorgia Healthcare Compliance: Breach Notification + State Medical Records RulesGeorgia O.C.G.A. § 10-1-911 breach notification and § 31-33-2 medical records access vs HIPAA: no fixed breach window, 30-day record access, fee-cap exposure, and UDTPA private right of action.
- ComplianceHIPAA Breach Notification: The 60-Day Window Step-by-StepFrom discovery you have 60 calendar days to notify individuals, HHS, and possibly media. Here is the procedure that actually protects the practice.
- RegulationCalifornia Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA, Cal. Civ. Code 56-56.37)California state law providing broader patient confidentiality protections than HIPAA for medical information held by providers, contractors, and certain employers.
- RegulationColorado Privacy Act (CPA, C.R.S. § 6-1-1301 et seq.)Colorado comprehensive consumer privacy law with consumer rights, controller/processor obligations, universal opt-out mechanism requirement, and an AG enforcement framework with HIPAA carve-outs.
- RegulationConnecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA, Public Act 22-15)Connecticut comprehensive consumer data privacy law with consumer rights, controller/processor obligations, and an AG enforcement framework — with substantial healthcare carve-outs.
- RegulationFlorida Information Protection Act (FIPA, Fla. Stat. § 501.171)Florida data breach notification and information security law requiring covered entities to maintain reasonable security and to notify affected individuals and the AG of breaches within 30 days.
- RegulationIllinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA, 740 ILCS 14)Illinois state law regulating the collection, retention, use, and destruction of biometric identifiers, with a private right of action and statutory damages per violation.
- RegulationMassachusetts 201 CMR 17.00 (Standards for the Protection of Personal Information)Massachusetts data security regulation requiring a written information security program (WISP) protecting personal information of MA residents, with specific technical requirements.
Last reviewed May 23, 2026.
This page is a research aid for compliance teams. It does not certify compliance with any state or federal law, provide legal advice, replace counsel, or guarantee an audit outcome. State statutes are amended frequently — verify citations and links against the cited primary sources before acting. The practice remains responsible for adopting and maintaining its compliance program.