Security

MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication)

Multi-Factor Authentication

Authentication requiring two or more independent factors — something you know, have, or are.

1 min read · Last reviewed May 23, 2026

At a glance

Category
Security
Acronym for
Multi-Factor Authentication
Primary sources
2
Workspace handoff
compliance binder

Where this comes up

This sits inside the security risk analysis under 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) — workstation controls, EHR access roles, ePHI transmission encryption, audit logging, vendor risk, and incident response. Reviewers expect dated evidence of the control, not a policy PDF that says it exists.

Full definition

What it is in practice

NIST SP 800-63B defines authenticator assurance levels and the cryptographic requirements for MFA. The HIPAA Security Rule does not name MFA, but practice-level risk analysis almost always points to it as a reasonable and appropriate control under 45 CFR 164.312(d).

How it shows up in your practice

Enable MFA on every administrative and remote-access account. SMS is acceptable but weak; prefer authenticator apps or hardware keys. Document the decision and exceptions in your risk register.

Sources

Take it into the workspace

Document authentication controls in the Compliance Binder

Open compliance binder
Authored by D3rx

D3rx is a healthcare-billing and compliance research aid maintained by D3rx Inc. Articles are drafted by an LLM (Anthropic Claude) against primary HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and state-regulator publications, and reviewed for restraint and source fidelity by the D3rx team.

Reviewer status: a named credentialed reviewer (CHC, CHPC, or healthcare attorney) is being engaged. Until that engagement is finalized, this page does not claim credentialed review.

This glossary entry is a research aid for billing and compliance staff. It does not provide legal, medical, or financial advice and does not replace counsel. References cited link to primary sources at HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and the relevant payer or industry body.