Denials & Appeals

CO-18 (Duplicate Claim)

Contractual Obligation 18 — exact duplicate of another claim.

1 min read · Last reviewed May 23, 2026

At a glance

Category
Denials & Appeals
Primary sources
2
Workspace handoff
denial workbench

Where this comes up

This is denial-workbench territory. A remit posts with a CARC/RARC, the biller decides whether to rebill, appeal, or write off, and the appeal packet has to cite the chart, the order, and the payer's own policy language. Recurring patterns trace back to an upstream workflow gap.

Full definition

What it is in practice

True duplicates are write-offs. Apparent duplicates (e.g., same date, same code, different sessions) need modifier 76, 77, or 91 with documentation.

How it shows up in your practice

Audit the original encounter. If the second submission was intentional, refile with the right modifier and a cover note.

Sources

Take it into the workspace

Resolve CO-18 duplicates in the Denial Workbench

Open denial workbench
Authored by D3rx

D3rx is a healthcare-billing and compliance research aid maintained by D3rx Inc. Articles are drafted by an LLM (Anthropic Claude) against primary HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and state-regulator publications, and reviewed for restraint and source fidelity by the D3rx team.

Reviewer status: a named credentialed reviewer (CHC, CHPC, or healthcare attorney) is being engaged. Until that engagement is finalized, this page does not claim credentialed review.

This glossary entry is a research aid for billing and compliance staff. It does not provide legal, medical, or financial advice and does not replace counsel. References cited link to primary sources at HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and the relevant payer or industry body.