HHS42 CFR Part 2

42 CFR Part 2 Court Order Exception (42 CFR 2.61-2.67)

The narrow exception permitting disclosure of Part 2 records pursuant to a court order issued after specific good cause findings.

Primary source

42 CFR Part 2 Subpart E — eCFR

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-2/subpart-E

Verified May 23, 2026 · This is the authoritative regulator URL. The summary below is a research aid; the linked source controls.

Subpart E of Part 2 (42 CFR 2.61-2.67) governs the court-order exception — the principal pathway by which Part 2 records can be compelled in litigation or criminal proceedings without patient consent.

The court must make specific findings of good cause. For non-criminal proceedings: other ways of obtaining the information are not available or would not be effective; and the public interest and need for disclosure outweigh the potential injury to the patient, the patient-program relationship, and the program's treatment services.

For criminal investigations or prosecutions of patients: the additional findings include that the crime is extremely serious (e.g., causing or threatening loss of life or serious bodily injury), that there is reasonable likelihood the records will contain information of substantial value to the investigation, and that other ways of obtaining the information are not available.

A subpoena alone is not enough. A grand jury subpoena, administrative subpoena, or discovery request must be accompanied by the requisite court order with good-cause findings before a Part 2 program may comply. Practices receiving Part 2 demands should consult counsel before disclosing.

Use this in your workspace

D3rx assembles the documentation linked to this regulation, walks the practical decisions in plain English, and stores the artifacts against the .gov sources cited above. It is an administrative research aid, not a substitute for counsel.

Related regulations

Authored by D3rx

D3rx is a healthcare-billing and compliance research aid maintained by D3rx Inc. Articles are drafted by an LLM (Anthropic Claude) against primary HHS, OCR, CMS, eCFR, NIST, and state-regulator publications, and reviewed for restraint and source fidelity by the D3rx team.

Reviewer status: a named credentialed reviewer (CHC, CHPC, or healthcare attorney) is being engaged. Until that engagement is finalized, this page does not claim credentialed review.

Last reviewed May 23, 2026 · Citation verified May 23, 2026

Research aid, not legal advice. This summary is an administrative research aid prepared by D3rx. It does not certify compliance, provide legal advice, replace counsel, or guarantee an audit outcome. For authoritative regulatory text follow the primary source link at the top of this page. The practice remains responsible for reviewing, adopting, and maintaining its compliance program.